The Effect of Sample Volume Variation on Blood Glucose Measurements Using POCT Devices within the Context of Public Health Services

Authors

  • Rony Puasa Program Studi Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Poltekkes Kemenkes Ternate
  • Aan Yulianingsih Program Studi Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Poltekkes Kemenkes Ternate https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1464-1151
  • Febrianti Jakaria Program Studi Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Poltekkes Kemenkes Ternate
  • Nikma Program Studi Teknologi Laboratorium Medis, Poltekkes Kemenkes Ternate

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32382/medkes.v20i2.1798

Keywords:

Blood Glucose, Sample Volume, POCT, Public Health, Accuracy

Abstract

Blood glucose testing is a crucial step in the detection and monitoring of diabetes mellitus, especially within the context of public health services. The use of Point-of-Care Testing (POCT) devices has become a practical choice due to their speed and ease of use. However, the accuracy of the test results can be influenced by various factors, one of which is the volume of the blood sample utilized. This study aims to evaluate blood glucose measurements using variations in sample volume on a POCT device. The research employed a laboratory experimental design with a within-subject approach. A total of 55 respondents participated in the study. The blood sample volume variations tested were 0.3 µl, 0.5 µl, and 0.7 µl. The measurements were carried out using the Easy Touch POCT device, and the results were compared with a standard laboratory control instrument. The study findings indicate that a blood sample volume of 0.7 µl produced glucose values most consistent with the standard laboratory results, where, based on SPSS analysis, the p-value was > 0.05 (0.137 > 0.05), indicating no significant difference between the POCT measurements and the standard laboratory instrument at this volume. In contrast, sample volumes of 0.3 µl and 0.5 µl showed significant differences compared to the reference values (p < 0.05), which could affect the accuracy of the measurements and potentially impact the accuracy of diagnosis and patient monitoring. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the volume that yields the highest accuracy for glucose testing using the Easy Touch POCT device is 0.7 µl. This study highlights the importance of standardizing blood sample volume in the use of POCT to enhance the accuracy of test results, particularly in primary healthcare settings such as community screening programs or public health centers (puskesmas).

References

Dianna J. Magliano C chair, EJBC chair. IDF DIABETES ATLAS 10th. scientific committee. Vols. 978-2-930229-98–0. International Diabetes Federation; 2021.

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. Situasi Diabetes di RI, Naik Terus hingga Tembus 30 Juta Kasus. Kemenkes RI. 2025;

Choi S, Choi SJ, Jeon BR, Lee YW, Oh J, Lee YK. What We Should Consider in Point of Care Blood Glucose Test; Current Quality Management Status of a Single Institution. Medicina (B Aires). 2021 Mar 4;57(3):238.

Nichols JH. Utilizing point-of-care testing to optimize patient care. 2021.

Dahman LS Bin, Daakeek AM, Alghazali HS, Kaity AM, Obbed MS. Evaluation of the Three Glucometer Devices Performance in Comparison with the Cobas Integra 400 Plus Autoanalyzer in Measuring Blood Glucose Levels: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. J Diabetes Mellitus. 2021;11(04):132–42.

Bequette BW. Algorithms for a Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas: The Case for Model Predictive Control. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013 Nov 1;7(6):1632–43.

Jendrike N, Baumstark A, Kamecke U, Haug C, Freckmann G. ISO 15197: 2013 Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System’s Measurement Accuracy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov 29;11(6):1275–6.

Mader JK, Baumstark A, Tüting J, Sokol G, Schuebel R, Tong Y, et al. Monitoring of the Analytical Performance of Four Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: A Post-market Performance Follow-Up Study. Diabetes Therapy. 2024 Dec 28;15(12):2525–35.

Bolat S, Sürer H, Çolak Samsum E, Yücel D, Şeneş M. Comparison of lipemia interference created with native lipemic material and intravenous lipid emulsion in emergency laboratory tests. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2024 Jun 15;34(2):240–53.

Dewi OY, Saputro AA, Islamiyah N, Dwi Kurnia S. Perbedaan Hasil Pemeriksaan Kadar Glukosa Darah Sewaktu Menggunakan Metode Glucose Oxidase-Peroxidase Aminoantypirin (God-Pap) Dan Strip Test Poct (Point Care Of Testing). Vol. 4, Jurnal Medika Indonesia. 2023.

Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Zschornack E, Kocher S, Tshiananga J, et al. System Accuracy Evaluation of 27 Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems According to DIN EN ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Mar;12(3):221–31.

Summerfield DD, Hartung KJ, Wiese CR, Wockenfus AM, Katzman BM, Donato LJ, et al. Relationship between free hemoglobin (hemolysis), potassium and ionized calcium in lithium heparin blood gas samples collected intraoperatively. Clin Biochem. 2019 Aug;70:46–8.

Luan X, Ke L, Feng M, Peng W, Luo H, Xue H, et al. Risk management in POCT blood glucose monitoring: FMEA approach aligned with ISO 15189:2022. PLoS One. 2025 Mar 10;20(3):e0319817.

K.D. Healthcare Solutions. EasyTouch blood glucose meter user manual [User manual]. https://www.kdhealthcare.com/easytouch-manual: K.D. Healthcare Solutions; 2022.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Collection of capillary blood specimens; Approved standard (CLSI- GP42). eventh edition. https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/clsi/clsigp42a6: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020.

Sauer-Budge AF, Brookfield SJ, Janzen R, McGray S, Boardman A, Wirz H, et al. A novel device for collecting and dispensing fingerstick blood for point of care testing. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0183625.

Sugiyono. Statistika Untuk Kesehatan. Alfabeta; 2021.

Laerd Statistics. Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test using SPSS Statistics. Statistical tutorials and software guides. https://statistics.laerd.com/. 2021.

Pallant J. SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using IBM SPSS . 7th ed. Routledge.; 2020.

Pleus S, Jendrike N, Baumstark A, Mende J, Wehrstedt S, Haug C, et al. Evaluation of System Accuracy, Precision, Hematocrit Influence, and User Performance of Two Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Based on ISO 15197:2013/EN ISO 15197:2015. Diabetes Therapy. 2024 Feb 1;15(2):447–59.

Cai ZX, Jiang MZ, Chuang YJ, Kuo JN. Paper-Based Microfluidic Analytical Device Patterned by Label Printer for Point-of-Care Blood Glucose and Hematocrit Detection Using 3D-Printed Smartphone Cassette. Sensors. 2024 Jul 24;24(15):4792.

Bond M, Asma E, Peterson J, Oparah L, Alooh M, Kumara D, et al. Evaluation of commercial point-of-care glucometers for detection and monitoring of neonatal hypoglycemia in resource-constrained settings. BMC Pediatr. 2025 Dec 1;25(1).

Ginsberg BH. Factors Affecting Blood Glucose Monitoring: Sources of Errors in Measurement. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2009 Jul 1;3(4):903–13.

Albloui F, John J, Alghamdi O, Alseraye F, Alqahtani A, Tamimi W, et al. Effect of hematocrit, galactose and ascorbic acid on the blood glucose readings of three point-of-care glucometers. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2022 Dec 1;82(7–8):563–70.

Bangash HI, Kashif M, Hamid Y, Hayat T, Bilal B. Comparison of Results of Glucometer and Laboratory Technique for Glucose Measurement Among Children. medtigo Journal of Medicine. 2024 Oct 31;1(1):1–5.

Pham HN, Pham PNH, Phan HT, Cao LT, Thoi HTT, Do TDT, et al. Impact of hematocrit levels on the accuracy of specific blood glucose meters: A hospital‐based study. J Diabetes Investig. 2024 Oct;15(10):1472–82.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-03

How to Cite

Puasa, R., Yulianingsih, A., Jakaria, F., & Nikma, N. (2025). The Effect of Sample Volume Variation on Blood Glucose Measurements Using POCT Devices within the Context of Public Health Services. Media Kesehatan Politeknik Kesehatan Makassar, 20(2), 442–447. https://doi.org/10.32382/medkes.v20i2.1798
Abstract viewed: 15
PDF downloaded: 10